One of the most talked-about and divisive issues of our time is genetic modification. It gives us the ability to alter and interfere with the genetic code of organisms, including people. Genetic engineering is now the subject of contentious debates among experts in various disciplines, the general public, international organizations, and legislators from various nations.
On the one hand, its accomplishments have the potential to protect humankind from deadly diseases, the threat of hunger, and chronic malnutrition. However, genetic engineering also raises a number of moral, social, and philosophical issues.
Genes can be deleted or replaced, new DNA can be inserted, or both. The goal of genetic engineering is to produce organisms with desired traits, such as disease resistance, environmental toleration, or greater yield.
Being a comparatively new technology, genetic engineering is still being developed. The development of "golden rice," which is enriched with vitamin A to help prevent blindness in developing nations, is one of the noteworthy achievements of scientists. The effort to turn a mouse into a "Frankenstein" creature by fusing human genes into its DNA is one of many contentious failures.
Crops' genes can be changed to increase their resistance to pests and illnesses. New crop varieties that are better adapted to our climate and soil can also be developed.
Genetic engineering can be used to develop novel medicines and illness treatments in addition to enhancing the quality of our food supply. Cells' genes can be changed to increase their resistance to illness, stop it from spreading, or even treat it. For instance, the therapy of cancer has already benefited significantly from genetic engineering. We have significantly increased cancer patient mortality rates by modifying immune cells to target cancer cells. Additionally, we are using genetic engineering to create fresh HIV and other virus therapies.
Numerous ethical issues are raised by the use of genetic engineering techniques in livestock husbandry. By using genetic engineering techniques to "improve" some breeds of agricultural animals, scientists actively seek financial gains from the intensification of agricultural production processes. However, the cruelty of such genetic trials is shocking.
In the field of genetic engineering, the issue of designer children is contentious. While some people contend that this could give rise to significant ethical problems, others feel that parents should be able to choose the characteristics of their children.
Parents could produce a designer child in a variety of methods. They could, for instance, use genetic testing to choose embryos with desirable characteristics or change their child's genes after delivery. However, these techniques come with dangers as well. For example, it's possible that genetic changes will have unintended effects or that parents won't be able to decide which characteristics their child will receive.
Because it involves tampering with a human embryo's genes, some people think that designer infants are immoral. Others contend that the benefits of designer babies may include a decrease in the probability of genetic diseases.
Significant concerns about societal inequality are also brought up by designer babies. What does it imply for the future of humanity if wealthy parents can afford to produce genetically altered children who are healthier and smarter than their peers? Designer infants pose the real threat of widening the divide between the wealthy and the poor and fostering even greater inequality in society.
There are worries that "superhumans" who are stronger, quicker, and smarter than the rest of us could be produced using designer babies. It might result in a brand-new type of eugenics where only the affluent could afford to have genetically altered children, thereby escalating social inequality.
Comments